General Counsel
Consulting
provided
exceptional
service in helping
my organization
recruit for a hard
to fill position.
They did extensive
work on the front
end to understand
our needs and
our culture and
began referring
highly qualified
candidates almost
immediately.
Melinda Burrows
Deputy General Counsel
- Litigation and
Compliance, Progress
Energy Service Company
LLC
Articles By Harrison Barnes From BCG Attorney Search
Trust & Estate Admin Attorney - Remote California Newport Beach California United States
"Certain beneficiaries and trustees lacking legal counsel that we fund trust loans for, generally for tax relief and property buyout purposes -- need help from an attorney. Your fees are paid by the family trust. Contact us ASAP..."
We are ...
Unprecedented Retake Announced After Widespread Exam Disruptions
The State Bar of California has announced an unprecedented retake of the February 2025 bar exam following widespread technical failures and login issues that prevented a significant number of test-takers from completing the first day of the newly developed licensing test. This decision comes after multiple reports of severe disruptions, leaving many examinees in distress and uncertainty about their futures.
The announcement marks a critical moment for the legal community, as it raises questions about the reliability of the state’s new hybrid testing format. While the California Bar had intended to modernize the exam process, the botched rollout has led to frustration, financial concerns, and a loss of confidence in the testing system.
Exam Day Chaos: What Went Wrong?
The two-day bar exam, which debuted California’s hybrid testing format—offering both remote and in-person options—encountered major setbacks on Tuesday, its first day. Many candidates reported being unable to launch the exam, while others faced repeated software crashes, frozen screens, and proctoring failures.
State Bar Executive Director Leah Wilson acknowledged the problems, stating:
“It’s clear that the exam did not go smoothly for an unacceptable number of test-takers.”
For those who managed to complete Tuesday’s exam, their results will still count, and they were able to proceed with the second day of testing on Wednesday. However, the bar is still evaluating the full extent of the disruptions.
Test-Taker Frustration: A System Failure
Many bar applicants expressed despair over the testing failures. Among them was David Drelinger, a 2023 graduate of Lincoln Law School in Sacramento, who struggled for hours attempting to access his exam.
“I’ve never had this much despair and hopelessness,” Drelinger said. “I’ve invested hundreds of thousands of dollars into becoming a lawyer. It’s supposed to pay off, eventually. It feels so far out of reach right now.”
Drelinger attempted to switch internet connections and laptops multiple times, but to no avail. His story is just one of many, highlighting the emotional and financial strain these technical failures have placed on examinees.
Behind the Technical Glitches: What Caused the Bar Exam Disaster?
The newly redesigned California bar exam was fast-tracked in August 2024 and developed by Kaplan Exam Services. Examinees were given the option to take the test remotely or at in-person locations, with the administration handled by Meazure Learning. The transition was initially projected to save up to $3.8 million annually by eliminating the need for large event spaces, but logistical failures have led to unexpected costs and widespread frustration.
Candidates had been warning of potential technical and logistical challenges for weeks. Complaints included:
Software failures and login issues
Contradictory instructions from Meazure Learning and the State Bar
Confusing refund and withdrawal policies
Proctoring software failing to verify candidates’ identities
Arbitrary disconnections from the exam platform
Despite these warnings, the test proceeded as scheduled, leading to the mass failures seen on Tuesday.
State Bar’s Response: Retakes, Refunds, and Policy Changes
In response to mounting criticism, the State Bar implemented several measures to address the situation:
February 13: Examinees were offered the option to withdraw and receive a full refund.
February 21: The bar announced that those who fail the exam can retake the July 2025 test at no cost.
March 3-4: A special retake will be offered to those impacted by technical failures.
As of Monday, 964 of the 5,600 registered examinees had withdrawn from the exam. However, with a retake now officially scheduled, many are left wondering if the new system is truly ready to handle such a high-stakes test.
The Impact on the Legal Industry
The California bar exam debacle has significant implications for the legal industry, both in the short and long term. Some of the major concerns include:
1. Delayed Entry of New Attorneys
With nearly 1,000 test-takers withdrawing and many others forced into a retake, California faces a backlog of new attorneys entering the profession. This delay can impact law firms, public interest organizations, and government agencies that rely on a steady influx of new legal talent.
2. Credibility and Trust Issues
Legal professionals, law schools, and employers now question the credibility of the State Bar’s ability to administer a reliable examination. The technical issues have undermined confidence in the fairness and security of the licensing process.
3. The Future of Remote Testing
This failure serves as a cautionary tale for jurisdictions considering remote or hybrid bar exams. While cost-cutting measures and accessibility improvements are commendable, security risks and technological inefficiencies must be addressed before further expansion of online testing.
4. Potential Legal Challenges
Affected test-takers may pursue legal action against the State Bar or its exam providers. Lawsuits could range from breach of contract claims to negligence lawsuits for failing to provide a functioning examination system.
FAQs: Addressing Common Concerns
1. Who is eligible for the March 2025 retake?
All examinees who experienced technical issues that prevented them from completing the first day of the February exam are eligible for the retake.
2. Will the retake be in the same format?
The State Bar has not yet announced whether the retake will follow the same hybrid format or revert to an in-person-only model.
3. Can I take the July exam instead?
Yes, those affected can opt to take the July 2025 exam at no additional cost.
4. Will my February test scores still count?
If you successfully completed both days of the exam, your scores will still be considered valid. However, if you were unable to finish due to technical issues, you will need to retake the exam.
5. How can I file a complaint or request a refund?
Complaints and refund requests can be submitted through the State Bar’s online portal. The deadline for refund requests is March 15, 2025.
What’s Next for the California Bar Exam?
The February bar exam fiasco has raised serious concerns about the future of the state’s licensing process. Many are questioning whether a hybrid format—particularly with online proctoring—can ever be as reliable as traditional in-person testing. The State Bar has vowed to conduct a full review and implement necessary improvements, but skepticism remains.
Meanwhile, Meazure Learning has yet to issue a statement addressing the widespread failures, leaving many test-takers without answers.
For those affected, the March retake represents a second chance—but also another round of stress, uncertainty, and potential technical issues. As the State Bar continues assessing the situation, test-takers and legal experts alike will be watching closely to see how California handles its next bar exam administration.